A spacefaring people needs more than rockets and stations. No civilization has ever been built on technical capability alone. It needs people who choose to remain and pursue life beyond Earth’s orbit. It is culture — rooted in beauty, repetition and meaning — that turns infrastructure into home. Without it, space will remain a sterile domain — often visited but never inhabited.
Private firms now lead the charge into orbit, the moon, and beyond. Their visions are ambitious: tourism, manufacturing — even settlement. But such ambitions require demand that persists beyond novelty. And demand will not endure unless space becomes desirable not only for its wonder but for its way of life. If the space economy is to grow, then space must become livable. Not in the sense of breathable air and safe shelter, but in the deeper sense of belonging.
Culture creates that.
Among all the tools of culture, cuisine stands apart. Food enters daily life more reliably than literature or fashion. It is repeated, remembered and shared. It forms rituals without command and pleasures without instruction. Cuisine gives texture to identity and dignity to survival. Where language fails or art divides, a well-prepared meal unites.
Yet space food today remains trapped in the language of science fiction and novelty, such as freeze-dried ice cream. This must change. For space to feel lived-in, space cuisine must be elevated to the level of art. It must evoke tradition, comfort and meaning — without losing sight of the frontier’s constraints. If we are to remain in space, we must prepare meals, not rations.
Let the first meal be worth remembering.
The economics of space: why demand must be cultural
Establishing the culture of space is essential if humanity is ever to live beyond Earth. Space firms offering crewed, tourism, and eventually off-world ferry launch services cannot survive on prestige alone. To become and remain commercially viable, they must attain economies of scale, reducing per-unit costs through high, sustained demand. The challenge is not only in launching payloads but in launching purpose. Launch vehicles may carry cargo, but what carries a civilization is meaning. So, if an enduring answer to the question, “Why should we go?” never appears, then all launch services are for naught. And meaning, when it endures, is cultural. Without it, launch providers will one day encounter their greatest fear: that they will have built excellent rockets, but nobody will want to use them.
Moreover, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has noted that the space economy’s future will rely heavily on commercial participation. Beyond defense and scientific missions, firms are now marketing orbital hotels, lunar construction and microgravity manufacturing. Unless space is to be populated entirely by robots, each promise requires a committed population of settlers, artists, families and workers enamored by the prospect of extraterrestrial living. To generate that love, space must become more than a destination. It must become a place where life unfolds.
This is the role of culture: to generate the habits, symbols and emotional investments that make a place worth inhabiting. Earth’s great cities were not built by engineers alone. They were sustained by marketplaces, festivals, cuisines and customs. Culture transformed utility into loyalty. And loyalty became longevity. The same must now happen in orbit.
Subcultures on Earth have proven that identity can be a consciously curated market force. Skateboarding, cosplay, jazz, and tech startups all began as niche communities. They flourished because they created daily rituals and expressive symbols. They gave people a way to belong. Space firms would do well to learn from this.
When culture drives demand, participation becomes purpose. And when purpose enters orbit, the space economy becomes more than sustainable — it becomes inevitable.
Subcultures that last: lessons from Earthbound movements
The most enduring cultural movements of the modern era began not in palaces or universities but in bedrooms, basements and online forums. They were small at first — easy to mock and easy to miss. Yet over time, subcultures like goth, steampunk and cottagecore built entire aesthetic economies. They created rituals, values and daily practices. And in doing so, they became self-sustaining engines of demand.
Goth culture, for instance, began as a niche music scene. It grew not because of formal institutions, but because of clothing, literature, interior design and shared emotional sensibilities. Its distinct look and sound turned alienation into identity. Steampunk did something similar — by fusing Victorian fashion with speculative technology, it carved out a retrofuturist world that found expression in everything from novels to teapots. Cottagecore, by contrast, rose on digital platforms as a soft rebellion against industrial life. It revalorized baking bread, tending gardens and living slowly, inspiring thousands to buy vintage aprons and share pastoral aesthetics.
What these movements share is their power to turn aesthetics into belief, belief into habit, and habit into commerce. They generate demand not by commanding attention, but by rewarding participation. Products are not bought out of necessity — they are purchased to affirm membership.
Space culture has yet to achieve this. It remains tethered to science and spectacle — companies raise funds describing a new frontier that remains completely inaccessible. But by studying these subcultures, space firms can see the value of aesthetic coherence and ritual practice. A culture, once kindled, grows through participation. And the more it is lived, the more it becomes indispensable.
Cuisine as culture: the civilizing power of meals
Among all instruments of culture, cuisine is the most persuasive. It travels easily, seduces without explanation, and enters the body before it enters the mind. Where language may be mistranslated and customs misunderstood, food is immediate and universal. A well-composed dish communicates continuity, identity and memory in a single bite. It transforms foreignness into invitation. In so doing, it ceases to remain merely a cultural artifact and becomes a cultural ambassador.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the history of France. French cuisine did more than reflect the nation’s character. It shaped it. Beginning in the 17th century, French court chefs formalized a culinary style that conveyed refinement, hierarchy and regional pride. By the 19th century, cookbooks such as those by Marie-Antoine Carême and later Auguste Escoffier systematized this approach into an art form. The cuisine became more than sustenance — it became the nation’s soft power.
French food then moved outward. Through diplomacy, colonization and cultural export, it became synonymous with elegance and good taste. Haute cuisine served as a gateway into the broader French aesthetic. In cafes and dining rooms abroad, people encountered France not through policy or philosophy, but through soufflés and sauces.
Space cuisine offers similar prospects. To popularize a new way of life, one must begin with the table. Food is accessible, repeatable and emotionally resonant. A dish, served often and with intention, does more to ground a culture than monologues, manifestos or monuments.
The problem with space food today
Despite decades of technical advancement, space food remains a cultural orphan. It is frequently marketed as a novelty — something to be gawked at in museum gift shops or sampled for amusement. Freeze-dried strawberries and vacuum-packed macaroni are symbols not of refinement, but of gimmickry. They evoke nostalgia, yesteryear’s science fiction or childhood field trips — not a serious culinary tradition. This perception, while commercially exploitable in the short term, is unsustainable for a mature spacefaring culture.
The early constraints of space travel demanded radical adaptations: food had to be shelf-stable, low-crumb, compact and easy to consume in microgravity. These limitations were met with remarkable ingenuity, but the results were utilitarian. NASA’s early menus included bite-sized cubes coated in gelatin and squeezable purées delivered through aluminum tubes — an approach that emphasized calories over ceremony. These designs, while functional, lacked the social and emotional dimensions of shared meals.
As public interest grew, space food entered the civilian imagination in ways that further trivialized it. Marketed as a souvenir, it became a curiosity rather than a cuisine. Even among space professionals, meals are often described in clinical or comedic terms. The result is a cultural void where a foundation could have been laid.
To change this, space food must be reframed — not as a scientific anomaly, but as an artistic challenge. It must speak to memory, comfort and beauty. A mature space culture cannot subsist on nostalgia for Earth or fetishization of innovation. It must feed the soul, not only the body.
Designing for delight: the constraints and creativity of space cookery
Cooking in space is not impossible — it is difficult. But difficulty, when met with intention, encultures. The constraints of space should not be seen as obstacles to flavor, but as invitations to creativity. Throughout history, culinary excellence has often emerged from hardship. Peasant stews, preserved meats and fermentation techniques all arose from necessity. Space offers a similar challenge.
In microgravity, traditional cooking methods — boiling, frying, baking — become impractical or dangerous. Open flames are prohibited, water behaves unpredictably and food particles can float into ventilation systems. These conditions demand new tools and methods. Convection ovens have been adapted for orbit. Hydrocolloids and gels allow for controlled textures. Dehydration and rehydration have become techniques for layering flavor and not merely stripping it.
Presentation must also adapt. Floating food requires new forms of plating — perhaps sculpted pouches, edible containers or magnetic serving surfaces. Aromas may need to be intensified, as olfactory sensitivity is reduced in microgravity. And the act of dining must be reimagined: not hurried bites between tasks, but intentional ceremonies that draw people together in confined, artificial habitats.
Constraints breed creativity. They force a style. The style becomes identity. What separates a cuisine from a collection of recipes is its consistency under constraint — how it answers the same problems with beauty. The future of space food lies in this philosophy. Not indulgence, but refinement. Not novelty, but grace under pressure.
Toward a space cuisine canon
Every enduring cuisine rests on a canon. It is not merely a collection of ingredients or techniques, but a way of thinking — a set of values applied consistently under familiar constraints. French cuisine reveres sauces, Japanese cuisine elevates seasonality, and Italian cuisine honors regionality and simplicity. If space cuisine is to mature, it too must be defined by principles that both limit and inspire.
The first principle must be ritual. A spacefaring society will contend with isolation, repetition and artificiality. Shared meals, structured with intention, can impose rhythm on a formless environment. Mealtime must become more than sustenance — it must become punctuation in the daily life of a station or colony. This gives meaning to a clock that tracks time on a now-distant home planet — and connection to the community.
The second principle is symbolism. Space cuisine must evoke not only the conditions of space but the memory of Earth. Ingredients should reflect our planet’s diversity, but dishes must reflect the journey. Meals should become commemorative, even liturgical. In the same way that Thanksgiving dinner speaks to harvest and history, a space meal can honor launches, landings and lightyears.
Third is restraint. Space cuisine will be defined by limitation — of mass, volume, energy and time. But these boundaries create clarity. The most iconic cuisines in the world were born from scarcity, not abundance. Let the same be true of space.
Finally, space cuisine must embrace innovation without gimmickry. It should welcome lab-grown protein and oxygen-stable emulsions, not as novelties, but as tools of dignity. A canon is not nostalgic. It is foundational.
With the embrace of these four principles, the age of freeze-dried strawberries ends. And the age of intentional, ceremonial meals can begin.
The first supper: a seven-course meal for the space age
Cuisine becomes canon when it tells a story — and the story of space demands retelling. Through symbolic structure and sensory design, a meal can reflect the journey of humanity beyond Earth. To inaugurate space cuisine as a serious cultural tradition, I propose a seven-course meal. Each dish represents a milestone in the history of space exploration, transforming historical memory into a ritual of taste.
The meal begins with a caviar-topped blini, commemorating Sputnik’s launch in 1957. Like the satellite it honors, this amuse-bouche is compact yet profound. The pairing of humble blini and luxurious caviar mirrors the duality of Sputnik: modest in form, monumental in impact.
Next is rehydrated tortilla soup, symbolizing the early human spaceflight era. It evokes the improvisational practicality of Mercury, Gemini and Vostok missions. Tortillas, used for their low-crumb profile, reflect concessions to the realities of microgravity.
The third course, jerky, represents the Gemini missions’ strides toward endurance. Light, efficient and protein-rich, it nods to the era’s emphasis on survival, experimentation and resourcefulness.
As the main course, we present a corned beef sandwich — a direct reference to astronaut John Young’s unsanctioned snack aboard Gemini 3. Though unofficial, the sandwich endures as a symbol of humor, rebellion and humanity amid extraordinary achievement.
The salad course features hydroponic greens, representing the International Space Station and our growing capacity to sustain life off-Earth. Crisp arugula and lettuce, grown without soil, embody a future of closed-loop sustainability.
A cheese platter of international varieties follows, honoring the era of global cooperation. It speaks to the unity forged aboard the ISS, where Russian, American, European and Japanese astronauts dine together in orbit.
Finally, dessert is freeze-dried ice cream. Often treated as a joke, it is reclaimed here as a symbol of optimism and ingenuity. It celebrates humanity’s capacity to blend function and delight — to engineer joy in the void.
This is more than a meal. It is a ceremony — an edible epic, meant to be remembered, repeated and revered.
Zachary Botkin is a cybersecurity analyst at Cambridge International Systems, a NASA subcontractor.
SpaceNews is committed to publishing our community’s diverse perspectives. Whether you’re an academic, executive, engineer or even just a concerned citizen of the cosmos, send your arguments and viewpoints to opinion@spacenews.com to be considered for publication online or in our next magazine. The perspectives shared in these op-eds are solely those of the authors.
